tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post1933983045531343007..comments2023-06-07T19:15:54.991+08:00Comments on 沒翅膀的我: ----willsinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13511522581504937498noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-10159731793623154142010-06-06T07:51:17.598+08:002010-06-06T07:51:17.598+08:00Nice quotation.
willsinNice quotation.<br /><br />willsinAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-24434294783815394102010-06-05T19:00:43.703+08:002010-06-05T19:00:43.703+08:00From a doctorate exam
What is the task of all hig...From a doctorate exam<br /><br />What is the task of all higher education?<br />-To turn a man into a machine<br /><br />By what means?<br />-He has to learn how to feel bored<br /><br />How is that achieved?<br />-Through the concept of duty<br /><br />Who is his model?<br />-The philologist: he teaches how to grind<br /><br />Who is the perfect man?<br />-The civil servant<br /><br />Which philosophy provides the best formula for the civil servant?<br />-Kant's: the civil servant as thing in itself set as judge over the civil servant as appearance<br /><br />-Nietsche, Twilight of the Idols一noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-77188700073611097732010-04-28T14:47:05.917+08:002010-04-28T14:47:05.917+08:00The distinction you draw between "experience&...The distinction you draw between "experience" and "representation of experience" can also be taken to mean the distinction between "experience" and "the condition of possibility of experience"? I have that interpretation because you mention Kant's transcendental concepts.<br /> I know very very little about Kant but I guess the question here is if what make experience possible are intuitions such as time and space, does this mean that the uniqueness of subjectivity is eliminated? <br /> "A particular experience related (and organised) by such concepts overrides my own uniqueness and the uniqueness of my place, and pushes them into an inessential corner that bears no influence on the character of the essence of the world's being."<br /><br /> Kant has often been criticized for adhering to a philosophy of empty formalism. This is consistent with you point about the elimination of individual uniqueness in Kantian ethics. But is this a result of his transcendental approach to philosophy?<br /> Speaking of Kant and inconsistency, Zizek's The Parallax View is highly relevant. The inconsistency, or what he calls the "parallax gap" is inherent, it's both epistemological and ontological. But I won't get into it here.WKCnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-24499084586721274462010-04-26T19:00:33.279+08:002010-04-26T19:00:33.279+08:00feeling unsettled
meilifeeling unsettled<br /><br />meiliAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-87393544682191762112010-04-25T01:32:16.025+08:002010-04-25T01:32:16.025+08:00Good points, WKC. You prompted me to reconsider wh...Good points, WKC. You prompted me to reconsider where the inconsistency as such lies. Perhaps it lies not so much in the fundamental contradiction in the world, as in the gap between lived experience and the way to register such experience. In other words, it is the difference between experience and representation of experience, and the problem of how these two sides can be put together. This begs the point where Kant began his questioning: how can transcendental concepts relate to my subjective experience in all its uniqueness? A particular experience related (and organised) by such concepts overrides my own uniqueness and the uniqueness of my place, and pushes them into an inessential corner that bears no influence on the character of the essence of the world's being. One consequence of this, perhaps, is that one loses the uniqueness of subjectivity, and as a result, we end up with a conception of subjectivity only as a possible Being, but not an essential, inescapably real Being. This possible Being, however, confers no meaning on me.<br /><br />What is ethics then, if ethics, according to Kant, could be grounded on the principle that all moral agents should make judgements as if their consequences did not apply to a particular case involving the agent's own interests and uniqueness?塘邊鶴noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-62716092976260230042010-04-22T15:50:43.051+08:002010-04-22T15:50:43.051+08:00Good piece. The point about inconsistency is inter...Good piece. The point about inconsistency is interesting. Think for example The Dialectic of the Enlightenment by Adorno and Horkheimer. The question there is how can we make sense of the Holocaust in the context of the Enlightenment. There is also the U.S., an advocate of human rights that is still occupying Iraq. Civilization generates savagery? May be the inconsistency you're referring to reflects a fundamental contradiction int he world? When we celebrate our birthdays, aren't we also getting closer to death?WKCnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-21434721913052068382010-04-22T13:47:57.729+08:002010-04-22T13:47:57.729+08:00慧劍係中國貨 (不過點都好過大陸貨),唔等使既, 要出西洋神劍,分析哲學至得,但係操刀者要定位準確,...慧劍係中國貨 (不過點都好過大陸貨),唔等使既, 要出西洋神劍,分析哲學至得,但係操刀者要定位準確, 唔係好易斬親willsinAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-60736565939625221002010-04-22T12:52:35.494+08:002010-04-22T12:52:35.494+08:00yan,
我都唔識磨呀!yan,<br /><br />我都唔識磨呀!W. Wonghttp://fishandhappiness.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-76096976522832343952010-04-22T11:43:56.010+08:002010-04-22T11:43:56.010+08:00Wong,
敢問亞黃,點先可以磨出一把慧劍呀?Wong,<br /><br />敢問亞黃,點先可以磨出一把慧劍呀?Yanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05543452661425487649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-58206706037311796072010-04-22T11:39:21.983+08:002010-04-22T11:39:21.983+08:00是willsin特別麻煩,因為他有很多心魔, 卻又沒有慧劍。是willsin特別麻煩,因為他有很多心魔, 卻又沒有慧劍。W. Wonghttp://fishandhappiness.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-34446157742388887152010-04-22T09:54:44.398+08:002010-04-22T09:54:44.398+08:00//麻煩的哲學佬, 麻煩的哲學妹!
說得很對。//麻煩的哲學佬, 麻煩的哲學妹!<br /><br />說得很對。Yanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05543452661425487649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-25153649521630343452010-04-22T09:50:28.737+08:002010-04-22T09:50:28.737+08:00麻煩的哲學佬, 麻煩的哲學妹!麻煩的哲學佬, 麻煩的哲學妹!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-89659435566074639112010-04-22T06:35:11.441+08:002010-04-22T06:35:11.441+08:00不錯的自述。不錯的自述。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-45785437264005252412010-04-21T19:15:41.046+08:002010-04-21T19:15:41.046+08:00好喜歡這一篇,像說中了心裡面的想法。好喜歡這一篇,像說中了心裡面的想法。Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17892612286112470452noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4117753732745943595.post-34580377178385742442010-04-21T19:05:58.762+08:002010-04-21T19:05:58.762+08:001. 你好像說我,現在很多時發覺自己內裡有一隻野獸,重係一隻好自卑o既野獸,諗左同做左好多白痴o既野...1. 你好像說我,現在很多時發覺自己內裡有一隻野獸,重係一隻好自卑o既野獸,諗左同做左好多白痴o既野。最後發覺發病的包括自己。<br /><br />2. 最近我 intensively 讀維根斯坦o既 PI, 你做乜學佢用 dash 呀?就是他寫o野時喜歡用 dash,攪到我頭都大埋。Yanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05543452661425487649noreply@blogger.com